Constructing Meaning in Computer-Mediated Communication: A Speech Act Perspective
Keywords:
Speech Acts, Digital Communication, Computer-Mediated InteractionAbstract
This study investigates how speech acts function in online communication, particularly in the absence of non-verbal cues such as tone of voice, gestures, and facial expressions. Adopting the framework of speech act theory by Austin and Searle, the research explores how users perform communicative actions like requesting, apologizing, and asserting using only text and platform-specific tools. Employing a qualitative approach, this research analyzes messages from online platforms to identify types of speech acts and strategies users apply to ensure their intent is understood. The findings reveal that users adapt language and utilize emojis, timing, punctuation, and politeness strategies to construct meaning and maintain interactional harmony. The study concludes that pragmatic competence and contextual awareness are critical to effective digital interaction. The implications of these findings highlight the importance of integrating digital pragmatics into language education, user training, and platform design to enhance the quality of online communication in various social and professional settings.
References
intercultural communication: A corpus based study on the use of emojis in German as a foreign language. Paper presented at the Intercultural Pragmatics Conference, Pisa, Italy.
Ge Stadnyk, J. (2021). Communicative functions of emoji sequences in the context of self presentation: A comparative study of Weibo and Twitter users. Discourse & Communication, 15(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813211002038
Hamdan, H. (2022). The communicative functions of emojis: Evidence from Jordanian Arabic speaking Facebookers. Psycholinguistics, 31(1), 141–172. https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2022-31-1-141-172
Holtgraves, T. (2024). Emoji, speech acts, and perceived communicative success. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X231200450
Inderasari, E., Rohmatika, A., & Kusmanto, H. (2023). Pragmatic functions of emojis in online learning communication: A cyberpragmatics study. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 10(1), 1–15.
Konrad, A., Herring, S. C., & Choi, D. (2020). Sticker and emoji use in Facebook Messenger: Implications for graphicon change. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 25(3), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmaa003
Leech, B., & Kaye, L. K. et al. (2020). Emoji accessibility for visually impaired people. In G. Tigwell, B. Gorman, & R. Menzies (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Human Computer Interaction (pp. 1–10). ACM.
Rosari, M. M. (2020). The speech act of request in computer mediated communication. Deskripsi Bahasa, 3(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.22146/db.v3i1.395
Tafazoli, D. (2023). Critical appraisal of artificial intelligence mediated communication. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.11897
Widiana, Y., Abdullah, S. N. S., & Sumarlam, S. (2024). Phatic emoji of Javanese netizens in social media: A cyberpragmatics perspective on a creative communicative strategy. Creativity Studies, 17(2), 589–600. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2024.16797
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Angela Shakila Aurel Pane, Bernieke Anggita Ristia Damanik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
