Ambiguity in Literal and Non-literal Meaning: A Pragmatic Linguistic Analysis
Keywords:
Lexical Ambiguity, Non-literal Language, ContextAbstract
Ambiguity in language often arises when meaning depends on contextual interpretation, particularly in the use of non-literal expressions such as idioms, metaphors, irony, and sarcasm. This phenomenon can hinder communication, especially among non-native speakers who may lack sufficient linguistic or cultural background to interpret intended meanings accurately. This study aims to analyze how pragmatic ambiguity operates and the role of context in resolving it. Using a literature review method, the study synthesizes findings from linguistic research published in the last decade. The results indicate that pragmatic ambiguity frequently occurs due to limited contextual cues, tone, and shared background knowledge. Three types of context linguistic, situational, and cultural were found to be crucial in disambiguation processes. While ambiguity may cause misunderstanding, it can also be used strategically to convey nuanced meaning, humor, and indirectness. The study concludes that strengthening pragmatic competence is essential for improving communicative effectiveness.
References
Attardo, S. (2020). The linguistics of humor: An introduction. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198791281.001.0001
Attardo, S. (2020). The linguistics of humor: An introduction. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198791281.001.0001
Bever, T. G., & Townsend, D. J. (2020). The psychology of language: An integrated approach to sentence comprehension. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003116187
Bohrn, I. C., Altmann, U., & Jacobs, A. M. (2017). Looking at the brains behind figurative language—A quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on metaphor, idiom, and irony processing. Neuropsychologia, 105, 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.01.023
Carston, R. (2018). Figurative language, loose use and pragmatic inference. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 465–492). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108182324.026
Carston, R. (2018). Irony, hyperbole and sarcastic comments: Pragmatic processes and their linguistic markers. Journal of Pragmatics, 128, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.02.009
Clifton, C., Jr., & Frazier, L. (2018). Syntactic ambiguity and its resolution. In S. Lappin & C. Fox (Eds.), The handbook of contemporary semantic theory (2nd ed., pp. 379–403). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118882139.ch14
Colombo, M., Shtyrov, Y., & Silvanto, J. (2020). Priming of conceptual representations in metaphor comprehension: Evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain and Language, 205, 104775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2020.104775
Dancygier, B. (2021). The language of stories: A cognitive approach. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198851435.001.0001
Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (2021). Figurative language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108878456
Domaneschi, F., & Penco, C. (2018). Irony, deception, and fake news: The pragmatic processes of interpreting nonliteral meaning. Lingua, 206, 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2018.01.005
Dynel, M. (2020). Irony, deception, and humour: Seeking the truth about overt and covert untruthfulness. Pragmatics & Cognition, 27(2), 209–239. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.18040.dyn
Frisson, S. (2021). Semantic underspecification in language processing. Language and Linguistics Compass, 15(1), e12402. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12402
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2019). Interpreting figurative meaning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316659745
Giora, R. (2018). Metaphor and irony: Language processing and mental representation. Lingua, 202, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2017.10.006
Giora, R. (2020). Metaphor and figure-ground in language processing. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.66
Hagoort, P., & Indefrey, P. (2018). The neurobiology of language beyond single words. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 41, 143–169. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-080317-061807
Murphy, M. L. (2021). Lexical meaning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316676056
Nieuwland, M. S. (2019). Do ‘early’ brain responses reveal word form prediction during language comprehension? A critical review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 96, 367–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.11.019
Nieuwland, M. S., & Martin, A. E. (2017). Neural oscillations and a nascent cortical network for semantic integration. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 29(5), 867–883. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01078
Nordquist, R. (2020). Understanding context in language. ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/context-language-term-1690450
Pexman, P. M. (2020). How we understand sarcasm and irony: Evidence from cognitive neuroscience. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420901597
Rodd, J. M. (2020). Settling into semantic space: An overview of semantic ambiguity resolution. Language and Linguistics Compass, 14(8), e12372. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12372
Ruytenbeek, N. (2021). Indirect requests and pragmatic processing: Experimental perspectives. Journal of Pragmatics, 172, 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.11.004
Sadeghi, B., & Taghizadeh, M. (2020). The effect of teaching idioms through contextualization on EFL learners’ comprehension and retention. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(2), 622–638. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.759241
Searle, J. R., & Vanderveken, D. (2018). Foundations of illocutionary logic (Reprint ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316718534
Solan, L. M., & Tiersma, P. M. (2020). Speaking of crime: The language of criminal justice (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226779814.001.0001
Staub, A. (2021). Eye movements and sentence processing. Annual Review of Linguistics, 7, 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-042920-040551
Taguchi, N., & Roever, C. (2017). Second language pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Tiersma, P. M., & Solan, L. M. (2019). The study of language and law. In L. M. Solan, J. Gibbons, & P. M. Tiersma (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and law (pp. 3–20). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572124.013.0001
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2012). Meaning and relevance. Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2019). Relevance theory. In C. Cummins & N. Katsos (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of experimental semantics and pragmatics (pp. 177–202). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791762.013.7
Yus, F. (2021). Relevance theory. In Y. Huang (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of pragmatics (pp. 199–216). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697964.013.10
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ariel Jonivedi Silalahi, Bernieke Anggita Ristia Damanik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
