Prophetic Political Meritocracy: Re-evaluating Prophet Muhammad’s Governance Framework for Contemporary Political Leadership

Authors

  • Muhammad Akhir Harahap Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Khoirotun Nisa Aulia Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Muhammad Fathi Aswan Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Anggi Sahputra Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Salman Faris Dalimunthe Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66867/yjssh.v2i2.305

Keywords:

Political Meritocracy, Leadership, Prophet Muhammad

Abstract

This study aims to examine the prophetic political meritocracy model in the leadership of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) and to evaluate its relevance as a governance framework for contemporary political leadership. The study employs a qualitative approach using a library research design. The findings reveal that Prophetic political meritocracy is constructed through the integration of four prophetic virtues (ṣidq, amānah, tablīgh, and faṭānah) with a governance system that emphasizes justice, deliberation (shūrā), public accountability, the rule of law, social inclusiveness, and the appointment of public officials based on competence and integrity rather than kinship, patronage, or social status. This model demonstrates that political legitimacy in the governance of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) was established through a balance between professional competence and moral responsibility in the exercise of public authority. The study proposes prophetic political meritocracy as a conceptual framework for political leadership that integrates ethical, institutional, and professional dimensions. It thereby contributes to enriching the discourse on Islamic political thought while offering an alternative perspective for reforming contemporary public governance toward greater justice, accountability, transparency, and the promotion of the public good.

References

Abur Hamdi Usman, Hadi, A., Azwar, A., & Mohammad Fattah. (2025). Adakah Rasulullah SAW Mengamalkan Nepotisme? Contoh Kes Pelantikan Usāmah ibn Zayd RA sebagai Panglima Perang. HADIS, 15(29), 30–46. https://doi.org/10.53840/hadis.v15i29.291

Afifi, A. A. (2024). Leader and the Leadership of the Prophet Muhammad: Strategy and Innovation in the Battle of Trench. Perwakilan: Journal of Good Governance, Diplomacy, Customary Institutionalization and Social Networks, 2, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.58764/j.prwkl.2024.2.62

Akhtar, S., & Razaq, A. (2020). E-4 Political and Diplomatic Strategies of World Leaders and the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) (An Analytical Study). Al-Aijaz Research Journal of Islamic Studies & Humanities, 4(2), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.53575/E4.v4.02(20).29-36

Aswar, H., & Afifi, S. (2024). An Analytical Study of the Da’wah Movement of Prophet Muhammad in Relation to Social Movement Theory. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 14(2), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.142.12

Elamin, M. O. I. (2024). Faith-Based Leadership in Conflict Resolution: The Practices of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). International Journal of Religion, 5(1), 535–546. https://doi.org/10.61707/f0r61319

Fijjar, M. N., Wasehudin, Mahsusi, Zulfikar, & Manaf, A. (2026). Digitalization Or Domestication? Prophetic Leadership And Talent Management Politics In The Constitutional Court. Petita: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Syariah, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v11i1.1180

Firdaus, D., & Ichwan, M. N. (2025). Meritocracy In The Correspondence Of Prophet Muhammad PBUH. Tasamuh: Jurnal Studi Islam, 17(2), 233–253. https://doi.org/10.47945/tasamuh.v17i2.2039

Mulaphong, D. (2023). Does Meritocracy Produce Desirable Outcomes for Public Organizations? Results of a Worldwide Expert Survey from 149 Nations. Public Integrity, 25(6), 578–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2022.2074763

Nabilah, A. A., Gusnata, G., & Kurniati, K. (2024). Relevansi Pemikiran Etika Politik Islam Al-Mawardi Terkait Kepemimpinan dalam Era Kontemporer. Ethics and Law Journal: Business and Notary, 2(2 SE-article), 193–201. https://doi.org/10.61292/eljbn.203

Nurma Yunita, Alfauzan Amin, Toha Andiko, & Puspita, T. (2025). DYNASTIC POLITICS OF THE DEMOCRATIC ERA IN INDONESIA (HADITH PERSPECTIVE ON NEPOTISM IN POLITICS). AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran Dan Hadis, 9(2), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v9i2.14786

Oliveira, E., Abner, G., Lee, S., Suzuki, K., Hur, H., & Perry, J. L. (2024). What does the evidence tell us about merit principles and government performance? Public Administration, 102(2), 668–690. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12945

Prayogo, A., Muhammad Nuh Siregar, D. S. Z., & Pia, A. (2023). Politik Islam Kontemporer: Analisis Hadis Tentang Pemimpin Pelindung Rakyat. IMTIYAZ: Jurnal Ilmu Keislaman, 7(2), 231–244.

Ruhullah, M. E., & Ushama, T. (2025). Leadership in Islam: A Spiritual and Theological Doctrine. Fikroh: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pendidikan Islam, 18(1), 54–74. https://doi.org/10.37812/fikroh.v17i1.1737

Sakdiah. (2016). Karaktertistik Kepemimpinan Dalam Islam (Kajian Historis Filosofis) Sifat-Sifat Rasulullah. Jurnal Al-Bayan, 22(33), 29–49. https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/bayan/article/download/636/540

Sertkaya, S., & Keskin, Z. (2020). A Prophetic Stance against Violence: An Analysis of the Peaceful Attitude of Prophet Muhammad during the Medinan Period. Religions, 11(11), 587. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11110587

Sidik, H., Nursyirwan, N., & Abdulahanaa, A. (2021). Nepotisme Gologan dan Jabatan. TASAMUH: Jurnal Studi Islam, 13(2), 189–216. https://doi.org/10.47945/tasamuh.v13i2.401

Suryanto, S. D. (2022). Partisipasi dalam Pengambilan Keputusan pada Pemerintahan Nabi Muhammad SAW. di Madinah. POLITEA, 5(1), 86. https://doi.org/10.21043/politea.v5i1.14248

Downloads

Published

2026-07-31

How to Cite

Muhammad Akhir Harahap, Khoirotun Nisa Aulia, Muhammad Fathi Aswan, Anggi Sahputra, & Salman Faris Dalimunthe. (2026). Prophetic Political Meritocracy: Re-evaluating Prophet Muhammad’s Governance Framework for Contemporary Political Leadership. Young Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(2), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.66867/yjssh.v2i2.305

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.