Polysemy and Homonymy in Semantic Interpretation

Authors

  • Elan Nuroctavia Purba Universitas HKBP Nommensen Pematangsiantar
  • Bernieke Anggita Ristia Damanik Universitas HKBP Nommensen Pematangsiantar

Keywords:

Lexical Ambiguity, Polysemy and Homonymy

Abstract

This article aims to examine the phenomena of polysemy and homonymy as major sources of lexical ambiguity that pose significant challenges in meaning interpretation, both in human communication and computational systems. Employing a literature review method, this study analyzes theoretical frameworks and relevant linguistic data. The findings reveal that polysemy refers to a single word with multiple related meanings, while homonymy involves identical word forms with unrelated meanings. Both phenomena complicate semantic understanding, particularly in pragmatic contexts and natural language processing tasks. The study emphasizes that pragmatic influence and frequency effects are key factors in meaning resolution and disambiguation. These findings underscore the importance of developing more advanced semantic-pragmatic models and effective disambiguation strategies to enhance language comprehension and improve the performance of natural language processing applications in human-computer interaction.

References

Aleksic, A. (2025). Algospeak: How social media is transforming the future of language. Knopf Publishing.

Falkum, I. L., & Vicente, A. (2025). Polysemy: Current perspectives and approaches. ResearchGate.

Hassoun, A., Beacock, I., Consolvo, S., Goldberg, B., Kelley, P. G., & Russell, D. M. (2023). Practicing information sensibility: How Gen Z engages with online information. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.07184.

Peredy, Z., & Vigh, L. (2024). Analysing Generation Z communication attitudes, values and norms. Acta Periodica, 30(4), 4–19.

Pimentel, T., Maudslay, R. H., Blasi, D., & Cotterell, R. (2020). Speakers fill lexical semantic gaps with context. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02172.

Rodd, J. M. (2020). Lexical ambiguity resolution in context: A review of psycholinguistic and computational approaches. Journal of Memory and Language, 113, 104143.

Tamburrini, N., Cinnirella, M., Jansen, V. A. A., & Bryden, J. (2023). New applications of communication accommodation theory in social media. Wikipedia.

UMS Rappang. (2025). Semantics in digital communication: An analysis of WhatsApp language in academic interaction. Jurnal Laogi: English Language Journal, 11(2).

Viral Language 2025. (2025). A Gen Z guide to the future of slang, memes, and digital communication. Indie Press.

Wadeea, S. J. (2024). The cultural impact of Generation Z on neologism and its translation: Internet slangs as a model. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 30(6), 2751–2756.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-24

How to Cite

Elan Nuroctavia Purba, & Damanik , B. A. R. (2025). Polysemy and Homonymy in Semantic Interpretation. Young Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(3), 101–109. Retrieved from https://journal.sufiya.org/index.php/yjssh/article/view/172

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>