Unveiling Social Realities through Language: A Comparative Analysis of Halliday, van Dijk, and Fairclough’s Frameworks in Social Research
English
Keywords:
Discourse Analysis, Social Research Methodology, Linguistics.Abstract
Discourse Analysis (DA) has emerged as a critical instrument in social sciences to uncover power dynamics and social realities, particularly within the context of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, researchers often encounter methodological ambiguity when selecting the most appropriate framework among diverse linguistic traditions. This study conducts a critical comparative analysis of three dominant paradigms: M.A.K. Halliday’s Systemic Functional Linguistics, Teun A. van Dijk’s Socio-Cognitive Approach, and Norman Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis (as discussed in O'Regan, 2021). Using a qualitative library research method, this study deconstructs the epistemological foundations and analytical tools of each approach. The findings indicate that Halliday’s framework offers a microscopic lens on textual texture and register, van Dijk’s approach bridges text and society through cognitive mental models, while Fairclough’s model examines the dialectical relationship between language and institutional power. The study concludes with a comparative matrix, providing a methodological roadmap for researchers to align these frameworks with specific social inquiries, such as education, inequality, or policy analysis.
References
Alameda-Hernández, Á., & Jiménez-Briones, R. (2025). Critical Discourse Analysis And Systemic Functional Linguistics In Empirical Research: A Systematic Literature Review. English Studies at NBU, 11(2), 291–315. https://doi.org/10.33919/esnbu.25.2.6
Askurny, N. R., Syihabuddin, & Sudana, D. (2023). Critical Discourse Analysis through Systemic Functional Linguistics of SMS (Short Message Service) Phishing. Insaniyat: Journal of Islam and Humanities, 8(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.15408/insaniyat.v8i1.33584
Darong, & Canggung, H. (2022). It is all about clauses: Speech analysis using systemic functional linguistics theory. Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 10(1), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v10i1.13029
Dijk, T. A. van. (2000). Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. SAGE Publications.
Dijk, T. A. van. (2008). Discourse and context : a sociocognitive approach. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511481499
Edel, E. E., Gunawan, W., Zifana, M., & Nur, A. M. (2025). Critical Discourse Analysis of Anies Baswedan’s 2024 Indonesian Presidential Campaign Strategies. Jurnal Retorika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 11(1), 332–342. https://doi.org/10.55637/jr.11.1.11712
Fairclough, I., Mulderrig, J., & Zotzmann, K. (2021). Language and Power Essays in Honour of Norman Fairclough.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203431269
Mahrudin, M. A. S., Hidayat, D. N., Husna, N., & Alek. (2023). Critical Discourse Analysis of Moral Values in EFL Textbook for Senior High School. Al-Lisan: Jurnal Bahasa (e-Journal), 8(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.30603/al.v8i1.3287
Mustafa, M., Nirwana, Laely, N. H., Masjur, E. A., & Pitra, E. (2025). Trend of Critical Discourses Analysis Researches in Linguistics Journals of Sinta 1 to 4: from CDA model to Research Design. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 13(2), 4643–4663. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v13i2.6533
Nur, D. R., & Widodo, P. (2022). Critical Discourse Analysis of Jokowi Tweets Based on the ideational meta-function Systemic Functional Linguistic meta-function. Script Journal: Journal of Linguistic and English Teaching, 7(1), 196–205. https://doi.org/10.24903/sj.v7i01.1528
Puspitasari, A., & Utami, B. R. (2022). Critical Discourse Analysis of Social Class in Society and Language. Channing: Journal of English Language Education and Literature, 7(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.30599/channing.v7i1.1633
Rachmanayni, A., Hidayat, D. N., & Alek. (2024). A Transitivity Analysis Of Male And Female Primary School Students’ Opinion Essay. Jurnal Education and Development, 12(2), 191–196. https://doi.org/10.37081/ed.v12i2.5763
Santi, D., Salam, Andi, S. J., Mahmudah, & Azis, A. (2024). Critical Discourse Analysis of Netizens in the Context of the 2024 Presidential Election (Functional Systemic Linguistic Study). SOCIETIES: Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.26858/societies.v4i2.68096
Sari, C. P., Santoso, A., Roekhan, R., & Susanto, G. (2024). Exploring The Impact Of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) On Enhancing 21st Century Teachers’ Critical Reading Abilities. English Review: Journal of English Education, 12(1), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v12i1.9125
Suwandi, A. F., Uin, M. T., & Ampel, S. (2021). A Study of Systemic Functional Linguistics: Political Ideology of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in First Presidential Debate. Journal of English Education and Teaching (JEET), 5(2), 166–187. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.5.2.166-187
Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2015). Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (3rd ed.). In Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Zhou, X. (2024). Critical Discourse Analysis of an Inaugural Speech Based on Halliday’s Systemic Functional Grammar. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 25, 366–372. https://doi.org/10.54097/r2jh6661
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Selviana Napitupulu, Partohap Saut Raja Sihombing, Immanuel Onasis Kha Napitupulu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
